Customer Reviews
Average Customer Review
(7 customer reviews) 7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Cute patterns, padding not as thick as I liked,
February 28, 2011 Y. PAN (Annapolis, MD) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Itzy Ritzy Stroller Liner, Rodeo Drive (Baby Product)
This stroller liner has very cute and unique patterns to choose from. I have a red Baby Jogger City Select and it fitted perfectly. It even comes with the two pads for the shoulder straps. The price is pretty good compare to the Tivoli Couture. However, there IS a big difference in terms of the thickness of the padding. The Tivoli is really thick and I can imagine that it is pretty comfortable to sit on. This liner is just two pieces of fabric sewn together, virtually no padding in between the fabrics. So you are just looking for a liner (like for the summer or occasional use), then it is not too bad. However, if you want a much thicker liner so your baby will be pretty pampered, then Tivoli will probably be a better choice. I returned this product after I decided that I like the thicker type.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Love this stroller liner,
March 10, 2011 Ktkeeps - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Itzy Ritzy Stroller Liner, Licorice Swirl (Baby Product)
Not only does this add some flair to our boring black stroller, but it protects it from blowouts and pee accidents! Love it! I get compliments on it wherever I go.
itzy ritzy stroller liner,
May 13, 2012 paulie - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Itzy Ritzy Stroller Liner, Avocado Damask (Baby Product)
these liners are great...beautiful and even came with little soft covers for the straps so when (and if) the kids fall asleep they won't wake up with strap lines on their necks! the only problem was that i didn't read well enough and thought that the picture of them in a twin stroller meant that two liners came in a package...which is not the case..it was photographed that way to indicate that it was reversible.